International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Published by: Neoscriber Demo Publisher
Crossmark

The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results

Zahra Bahadoran 1 , Parvin Mirmiran 2 , Azita Zadeh-Vakili 3 , Farhad Hosseinpanah 4 and Asghar Ghasemi 5 , *
Authors Information
1 Nutrition and Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Clinical Nutrition and Diet Therapy, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Cellular and Molecular Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5 Endocrine Physiology Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism: April 30, 2019, 17 (2); e92113
  • Published Online: April 24, 2019
  • Article Type: Review Article
  • Received: April 9, 2019
  • Revised: April 15, 2019
  • Accepted: April 16, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijem.92113

To Cite: Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Zadeh-Vakili A, Hosseinpanah F, Ghasemi A. The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results, Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019 ; 17(2):e92113. doi: 10.5812/ijem.92113.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Context
2. The Function of the Results Section
3. Content of the Results Section
4. Organization of the Results Section
5. Emphasizing Important Results
6. Other Considerations
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Ohwovoriole AE. Writing biomedical manuscripts part II: Standard elements and common errors. West Afr J Med. 2011;30(6):389-99. [PubMed: 22786852].
  • 2. Thrower PA. Writing a scientific paper: IV. Results and discussion. Carbon. 2010;48(10):2675-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.041.
  • 3. Gastel B, Day RA. How to write and publish a scientific paper. ABC-CLIO; 2016.
  • 4. Cetin S, Hackam DJ. An approach to the writing of a scientific manuscript. J Surg Res. 2005;128(2):165-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.07.002. [PubMed: 16154592].
  • 5. Cunningham SJ. How to...write a paper. J Orthod. 2004;31(1):47-51. doi: 10.1179/146531204225011328. [PubMed: 15071152].
  • 6. Dogra S. Why your manuscript was rejected and how to prevent it. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(2):123-7. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.77449. [PubMed: 21393939].
  • 7. Peat J, Elliott E, Baur L, Keena V. Results. In: Peat J, editor. Scientific writing: Easy when you know how. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 63-85.
  • 8. Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Simera I, Wager E. Guidelines for reporting health research: A user's manual. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
  • 9. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, Cronin E, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008;3(8). e3081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081. [PubMed: 18769481]. [PubMed Central: PMC2518111].
  • 10. Bahadoran Z, Jeddi S, Mirmiran P, Ghasemi A. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Introduction. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;16(4). e84795. doi: 10.5812/ijem.84795. [PubMed: 30464776]. [PubMed Central: PMC6218661].
  • 11. Ghasemi A, Bahadoran Z, Zadeh-Vakili A, Montazeri SA, Hosseinpanah F. The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Materials and methods. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;17(1). e88155. doi: 10.5812/ijem.88155. [PubMed: 30881471]. [PubMed Central: PMC6413392].
  • 12. Ng KH, Peh WC. Writing the results. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(12):967-8. quiz 969. [PubMed: 19122944].
  • 13. Zeiger M. Results. In: Zeiger M, editor. Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. McGraw-Hill; 2000. p. 154-75.
  • 14. Annesley TM. Show your cards: The results section and the poker game. Clin Chem. 2010;56(7):1066-70. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.148148. [PubMed: 20489137].
  • 15. Foote M. The proof of the pudding: How to report results and write a good discussion. Chest. 2009;135(3):866-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2613. [PubMed: 19265097].
  • 16. Tips to improve your research paper: The results section. 2013. Available at: https://www.bestcustomwriting.com/blog/tips-to-improve-your-research-paper-the-results-section.
  • 17. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part V: Results. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(9):945. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.003. [PubMed: 23791158].
  • 18. American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American psychological association. 6th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2013.
  • 19. Riordan L. Enhancing your manuscript with graphic elements, part 1: Tables. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(1):54-7. [PubMed: 23329805].
  • 20. Riordan L. Enhancing your manuscript with graphic elements, part 2: Figures. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(5):424-31. [PubMed: 23667196].
  • 21. Lang TA, Secic M, Lang T. How to report statistics in medicine: Annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. ACP Press; 2006.
  • 22. O'Connor M. Writing successfully in science. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
  • 23. Kliewer MA. Writing it up: A step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(3):591-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850591. [PubMed: 16120904].
  • 24. Feynman RP. Cargo cult science. Engin Sci. 1974;37(7):10-3.
  • 25. Matosin N, Frank E, Engel M, Lum JS, Newell KA. Negativity towards negative results: A discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(2):171-3. doi: 10.1242/dmm.015123. [PubMed: 24713271]. [PubMed Central: PMC3917235].
  • 26. Swales JM, Feak CB. Constructing a research paper II. In: Swales JM, Feak CB, editors. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press; 2004. p. 327-78.
  • 27. Swales JM, Feak CB. Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Vol. 1. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press; 2004.
  • 28. Zeiger M. Towards clearer writing. Eur Respir J. 1993;6(4):457-60. [PubMed: 8491292].
  • 29. Faber J. Writing scientific manuscripts: Most common mistakes. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22(5):113-7. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.5.113-117.sar. [PubMed: 29160351]. [PubMed Central: PMC5730143].
  • 30. Browner WS. Publishing and presenting clinical research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  • 31. Zeiger M. Tables and figures. In: Zeiger M, editor. Essentials of writing biomedical research papers. McGraw-Hill; 2000. p. 223-60.
  • 32. Rothman KJ. Writing for epidemiology. Epidemiology. 1998;9(3):333-7. [PubMed: 12296359].
  • 33. Kotz D, Cals JW. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VII: Tables and figures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(11):1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.016. [PubMed: 23958377].
  • 34. Zhang Z, Gayle AA, Wang J, Zhang H, Cardinal-Fernandez P. Comparing baseline characteristics between groups: An introduction to the CBCgrps package. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(24):484. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.09.39. [PubMed: 29299446]. [PubMed Central: PMC5750271].
  • 35. Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: The "statistical analyses and methods in the published literature" or the SAMPL guidelines. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006. [PubMed: 25441757].
  • 36. Anderson DR, Link WA, Johnson DH, Burnham KP. Suggestions for presenting the results of data analyses. J Wildlife Manag. 2001;65(3):373. doi: 10.2307/3803088.
  • 37. Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ, American Physiological S. Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;287(2):E189-91. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00213.2004. [PubMed: 15271643].
  • 38. Tanha K, Mohammadi N, Janani L. P-value: What is and what is not. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:65. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.65. [PubMed: 29445694]. [PubMed Central: PMC5804470].
  • 39. Habibzadeh F. Common statistical mistakes in manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. J Eur Sci Edit. 2013;39:92-4.
  • 40. Fukuda H, Ohashi Y. A guideline for reporting results of statistical analysis in Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1997;27(3):121-7. [PubMed: 9255264].
  • 41. Sarter M, Fritschy JM. Reporting statistical methods and statistical results in EJN. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28(12):2363-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06581.x. [PubMed: 19087166].
  • 42. Cole TJ. Too many digits: The presentation of numerical data. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(7):608-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307149. [PubMed: 25877157]. [PubMed Central: PMC4483789].
  • 43. Peat J, Elliott E, Baur L, Keena V. Scientific writing: Easy when you know how. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
  • 44. Wallwork A. Results. In: Wallwork A, editor. English for writing research papers. Springer; 2016. p. 295-307. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26094-5_17.
  • 45. Araujo CG. Detailing the writing of scientific manuscripts: 25-30 paragraphs. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;102(2):e21-3. [PubMed: 24676380]. [PubMed Central: PMC3987331].
  • 46. Drotar D. Editorial: How to write an effective results and discussion for the journal of pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009;34(4):339-43. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp014.
  • 47. Pop M, Salzberg SL. Use and mis-use of supplementary material in science publications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:237. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0668-z. [PubMed: 26525146]. [PubMed Central: PMC4630891].
  • 48. Rogers SM. Mastering scientific and medical writing. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments